spinofflive
A very serious Jaffa investigation. Image design: Tina Tiller
A very serious Jaffa investigation. Image design: Tina Tiller

SocietyJuly 16, 2025

The shocking truth behind the death of Jaffas – a Spinoff investigation

A very serious Jaffa investigation. Image design: Tina Tiller
A very serious Jaffa investigation. Image design: Tina Tiller

Claire Mabey uncovers a giant Jaffas conspiracy. 

“You don’t know what you’ve got til it’s gone.” – Joni Mitchell in a song that was later covered by Counting Crows. 

“You don’t know what you’ve got til you realise you never had it.” – Claire Mabey

Content warning: What I am about to tell you will change everything you think you know. Please continue with care.

They’re small and round and tinged with citrus. They’re like marbles, only opaque, and not made of glass. Some people bite right into them like the cave men before us while others prefer to suck them slowly until the outer shell is compromised and eventually melts away to reveal the chocolate orange centre which also melts and becomes a tiny hot chocolate made with your own spit.

I, like many New Zealanders, like to indulge in a Jaffa at the movies. It’s a reliable, comfortable habit in a reliable, comfortable place. There’s the popcorn, and the Jaffas, and the pineapple lumps and there’s the previews and the dark room and the giant screen. In fact that’s the only place I have ever eaten Jaffas other than the odd one offered up for free with a long black – a lovely little gesture that felt like something that was just ours. A solitary treat-Jaffa given by the kind of cafe you could take your nana to.

When I heard that RJ’s was going to stop making Jaffas I discovered I was upset (though it was nothing compared to when Pascall stopped making Snifters). Isn’t there enough change in this world? Aren’t we losing so much already? The climate? Species? Why take away our movie treats too?

This question weighed heavy on my mind when I went to my local cinema, purchased my ticket to Jurassic Park: Rebirth, and a small white bag of Jaffas. As ScarJo and Jonathan Bailey dodged the grotesque mutant dinosaur and told each other that 99.9% of species are now extinct, I took comfort in sucking approximately 12 Jaffas so slowly they lasted almost the whole film. 

When the film was over I shuffled out of the dark cocoon and into the light with my empty little white paper bag in my hand (screwed up and sweaty thanks to the dinosaurs). I walked it to the rubbish bin closest to the counter and said to the cinema worker who was tidying up some empty water glasses: “It’ll be weird not to have Jaffas soon, eh?”

The young woman stared at me with a quizzical look. I’d said something wrong. “You know, Jaffas?” I said and pointed to the row of plump little white paper bags filled with Jaffas in front of her on the counter. RJ’s Jaffas in little white paper bags.

“Oh, yeah well actually we use Choc Orange Balls.”

Silence as I stared back, my heart giving odd little skips. “What are those?”

“Choc Orange Balls? You can get them from Moore Wilson’s.”

Choc Orange Balls? I stared at the bin. At the sad little paper bag lying there. All this time? I’ve been eating “Choc Orange Balls”? Have they always been Choc Orange Balls? Have I ever eaten an actual Jaffa? An actual RJ’s Jaffa? 

Have any of us?

I was shaken. Had I just inadvertently uncovered a massive conspiracy? Or was I simply the last one to know that there are off-brand Jaffas out there in the world masquerading as actual Jaffas? Determined to uncover the truth I pulled on my coat, pushed my way through the crowd and out onto the cold Wellington street. Everything looked different. Shop fronts, street signs … the air itself felt … colder. I took my usual shortcut through the carpark and down the side street to where Moore Wilson’s sat smugly like Wellington’s most Wellingtonian home of fresh produce and fancy breads and Ottolenghi products and freshly squeezed orange juice that people will literally line up for 30mins to get on a Saturday and that you can’t get at all when there’s flooding in Tairāwhiti.

I knew I’d never seen Jaffas at Moore Wilson’s before. At least not on the produce side. But what about the bulk purchases side? That’s where I once bought a carton of Spacemen and a massive tube of 100 Chuppa Chups. Could that be where these “Choc Orange Balls” lived? I held my breath as I slipped past the lanes of checkout workers and past the boxes of generically packaged lollies to the tall shelves where the branded bulk lollies were arranged. 

And there they were. Bold as brass. A huge box of red and brown bags with a small Moore Wilson’s product sign below them: “Confectionery House Chocolate Orange Balls 1kg. $24.70 / Ea.”

A photograph of a product called Choc Orange Balls which look like Jaffas.
Choc Orange Balls at Moore Wilson’s. Devastating.

The lady at the movies was telling the truth. Here they were right in front of me. Choc Orange Balls. I picked up a bag and inspected the contents through the window of clear packaging. Small, orange balls. Like marbles but opaque. I flipped the bag over and read and as I did my world came crashing down. “Handmade by our artisan confectioners right here in Australia.”

Oh. My. GOD. Australians. They hadn’t even tried to give them a cool name. Just Choc Orange Balls. Like something out of South Park. 

As I stood there in front of a wall of lollies in Moore Wilson’s, a bag of Choc Orange Balls heavy in my arms, I asked myself how long this had been going on? Who else was slipping into Moore Wilson’s to buy pretend Jaffas in bulk and hawking them as the real deal?

Maybe this was a one-off. Maybe this cinema just didn’t even really know? Maybe there was an Australian in charge with Australian tastes?

I grabbed a bag, paid $24.75 for it and got the number 29 home. Wellington has many cinemas. They’re part of what makes our city great. When it’s windy and shit you go to the movies and you eat Jaffas, real Jaffas, and chew them up with your popcorn so you get sweet-savoury at the same time. 

I got out my coloured post-its and wrote down the names of all the cinemas I could remember and stuck them on the wall in my office. One by one I phoned them.

“Hi, do you sell Jaffas?”

“Oh pretty sure we sell an off-brand Jaffa,” the guy on the other side said, and laughed.

WHAT.

“So, like, what do you sell?”

“Hold on, I’ll just go check.”

My heart was pounding, my pits were oozing, and I was shovelling Choc Orange Balls while I waited like they’re the ones going out of fashion.

“You there?”

“Yup.”

“We sell Choc Orange Balls.”

“Do you put them in little white paper bags?”

“Yes.”

“What do you call them?”

“Ah. Um … why do you ask?”

“Do you call them Jaffas?”

Suddenly he was suspicious. He knew I was investigating.

“Why are you asking?”

I slammed the phone down. I pulled the post-it with the name of that cinema off my wall and screwed it up and tossed it into the bin just like that little white paper bag that had never seen a Jaffa.

I called up the next cinema, trying to keep calm while my mind raced.

“Hi, do you sell Jaffas?”

“Yep.”

“RJ’s Jaffas that are Jaffas? Or do you sell something else?”

“We get Choc Orange Balls from Dandy Candy in Petone.”

Dandy Candy?

“What’s Dandy Candy?”

“A distributor.”

“Thanks,” I said, scribbling it down. “And before I let you go can I just ask if you sell your Choc Orange Balls in little white paper bags?”

“Yes we do.”

God damn it.

I put the phone down and stared at my notes. Dandy? Candy? It sounded like an off brand version of that terrifying Candyland board game where the gingerbread man has to run through lolly streets to escape certain death.

I turned to Google. “Dandy Candy NZ lollies distributor”. And there it was. Not Dandy but Dandi. Of course. 

There were rows and rows of branded treats: Cadbury, Pascall, The Natural Confectionery Company. I gingerly clicked into the search bar and typed, “Choc Orange Balls”.

An image of bright red-orange balls burst onto my screen. Not even any packaging, just naked balls spilling everywhere, some broken into rubble with their innards exposed like they’d been chewed and callously spat out.

A photograph of chocolate orange balls.
A product image on DandiCandy’s website.

It was true. Everything the cinema people had told me was true.

At the top of the screen was a phone number. Just a cell number, not even an 0800. Who knows where this string of digits would lead me next. I took a deep breath, dialled it and waited with my heart hammering in my ears. 

Ilesh Patel answered and what I didn’t know then was that this conversation would fundamentally change me as a person. What Patel told would transform my understanding of how lollies worked in this country; in this world.

DandiCandy is a family-owned and run licensed candy wholesaler that has been operating in the Wellington region for nearly 25 years. Patel has 480 customers including supermarkets, dairies, Air New Zealand, Kiwi Rail, and yes, cinemas. And Patel distributes 30 brands including RJ’s and its Jaffas. 

“It’s a big loss,” he told me, “but there’s always someone bringing in something else.”

“Like the Choc Orange Ball?” I asked.

Patel confirmed that they sell a lot of Choc Orange Balls but what he told me next blew my mind and made the decimated Choc Orange Ball now acidifying in my belly start to riot.

“The difference between Choc Orange Balls and Jaffas is that Choc Orange Balls are made out of compound chocolate.”

What in the fresh hell??

I flipped over the Choc Orange Balls packet in front of me and read the ingredients list: “Compound Dark Chocolate” was the first item. It’s not even buried – it’s just right there.

God Damn It! Is this like the friends episode where Monica has to make recipes out of Mocklit? I put Patel on speaker and frantically googled. “Compound chocolate is a product made from a combination of cocoa, vegetable fat and sweeteners. It is used as a lower-cost alternative to pure chocolate (“whole chocolate” is natural raw chocolate that contains cocoa butter) as it has less-expensive hard vegetable fats such as coconut oil or palm kernel oil in place of the more expensive cocoa butter,” says Wikipedia.

“So it’s not even real chocolate?” I asked. 

No, he said. No it’s not. 

What Patel explained to me next I can only relay in fragments and I’m sorry about it but I was reeling. I felt sick from all the compound chocolate in the Choc Orange Balls. But what he told me was that in essence we are just too small to sustain the Jaffa, or the Snifter, or the solitary packaged Chocolate Fish, or the god damn Toffee Milk! (I cried out as a core memory of buying five Toffee Milks for 50 cents from my local dairy shunted forth and stabbed me with its nostalgia.) Australian companies like The Confectionery House are just too big. They’re too powerful and what they dictate, we have to follow.

Patel then told me that RJ’s was sold to an Australian company in 2015 and what could be going on is actually it’s the Australian parent company that doesn’t want the Jaffa and we’re just too small to … 

WHAT? I put my head in my hands (Patel was still on speaker). Not. Even. Locally. Owned? RJ’s is Australian? What ISN’T Australian? When is this going to stop? When are they going to stop? God damn it!

“Are you there?”

I apologised to Patel and explained I just needed a second to compute the enormity of what he’d told me. He asked me then if I remembered the giant Jaffa. 

And I don’t. I don’t remember it because maybe it was too brief. Or maybe there never really was a giant Jaffa, just a giant Choc Orange Ball sold in a white paper bag.

Have I ever even eaten an actual Jaffa with its real chocolate and expensive fat? Will Australia ever stop taking stuff we really like even if we don’t actually buy it that often? 

All I know is that I have been eating Choc Orange Balls for a long time. I think a lot of us have been eating Choc Orange Balls for a long time. 

“That’s so much for your time, Ilesh,” I say. I put my phone down and stare at the packet in front of me. I glance up at my post-it wall. There is one cinema left. I pick up my phone once more, unsure if I am emotionally ready for whatever might come next, and dial the number. 

“Hi, do you sell Jaffas?”

“Yes! Jaffas are the bomb!”

I’m wary. “OK, but are they RJ’s Jaffas called Jaffas by RJ’s?”

“Yes! I’m going to really miss them. I love them.”

Bless you, angel.

“When they’re gone, will you go for an alternative, like… the Choc Orange Ball, have you heard of those?”

“No, but we probably won’t replace them.”

“Why not? Don’t people buy Jaffas?”

“Nah, not really. They just get M&Ms.”

Keep going!
Nobody seems to want a helicopter as a neighbour.
Nobody seems to want a helicopter as a neighbour.

SocietyJuly 16, 2025

Protest or court? The war against private helipads plots its next move

Nobody seems to want a helicopter as a neighbour.
Nobody seems to want a helicopter as a neighbour.

After a four-year process, a controversial helicopter landing site at the Westmere home of rich-listers Anna Mowbray and Ali Williams has been approved. What does that mean for their neighbours and the rest of Auckland?

On a dark and stormy Thursday night last week, more than 100 people gathered at the Hawke Sea Scout Hall in Westmere. Outside, over the tempestuous waters of Coxs Bay, the multimillion-dollar property at 38 Rawene Ave sat on its little outcrop, with a flat grassed area between the swimming pool and mature pōhutukawa finally allowed to have up to two helicopter flights take off and land in a day, up to 10 in a month, after a four-year long consenting process.

The people in the hall were not happy, despite the colourful bunting and the lovely mural of the Hauraki Gulf islands on the wall. They were there because, like 1,227 (of 1,397) written submissions made to council, they do not want toy billionaire Anna Mowbray and former All Black Ali Williams flying helicopters in and out of their home. By 7pm, the crowd, decked out in Kathmandu raincoats and woollen beanies, were seated and silently waiting for the public meeting called by Quiet Sky Waitematā to begin.

According to records from Auckland Council, the Mowbray-Williams helicopter pad is the 106th consented private helicopter landing site in Auckland. It’s the first in Westmere and there are four in the neighbouring Herne Bay suburb. Waiheke Island boasts the most by far with 64 (and two more in progress) and next up is Aotea Great Barrier with 10. Others are scattered – two in Dairy Flat, one in Papatoetoe, one in Clevedon, etc. 

mad showing hundreds of red dots
The vast majority of public submissions were against the private helipad on Rawene Ave – the red dots mark the locations of those opposed (Image: Auckland Council)

Residents of the leafy, wealthy coastal suburbs in the area – Westmere, Herne Bay and Ponsonby – have battled against private helicopter use for years. Similar squabbles have broken out in 2017, 2022 and 2023. The fight against the Mowbray-Williams helipad did not start on Thursday – in fact, Quiet Sky Waitematā says it has already fundraised and spent over $100,000 on the battle, including commissioning reports and research from an ecologist, a planner, an acoustic expert and a lawyer. They have fought on the grounds of noise, downwash (the air that helicopters push downwards) and dotterels.

Auckland Council did not initially approve the Mowbray-Williams resource consent application when it was made in 2021. However, it was appealed and then a panel of three independent hearing commissioners overturned the decision, despite a 356-page report prepared by council planners saying the helipad would adversely affect ecological values, trees, character, amenity and recreational activities. The panel used “discretion” as it considered the degree of non-compliance with the Auckland Unitary Plan to be “marginal”. During the hearing, the Mowbray-Williams lawyer argued that a helicopter was no different to a car or a bike and therefore should be a restricted discretionary activity, not a non-complying one. It seems the commissioners agreed as they concluded a private helicopter was a “permitted activity” that was “inherently associated with residential land use”.

It is this last ruling that Jeanette Budgett, chair of Quiet Sky Waitematā opened the public meeting with. For the group, it’s an opening of the rotor downwash gates. Why? According to Budgett, until now council planners have considered private helicopter use to be a non-complying activity. She said this new interpretation would mean future applications for private helicopter landing sites would no longer be publicly notified. Instead, it would be up to neighbours to prove the helicopter doesn’t meet noise standards once it was already coming and going, she said. Other considerations around the environment would be blown away. Budgett was succinct and sombre – she was keen to keep the meeting to an hour, and there were four more speakers and a Q&A to follow.

The speaker who most animated the slowly warming crowd was Auckland Central MP Chlöe Swarbrick, who started with, “This is really stupid! … This is a waste of all of our time!” Bums were on the edges of seats and breaths were held. “The law radically needs to change.” Phewf. Apparently, if the Greens had had their way in 2022 when the transport committee was making updates to some plan or other, private helicopter use would have been nipped in the bud, since it’s bad for communities and bad for the environment. Unfortunately, Labour’s Kieran McAnulty, associate minister of transport at the time, didn’t incorporate the Greens’ notes. Apart from the Greens being right if only people would listen and follow, the slow pace of the whole council consenting process was “utterly deranged” and “not democracy”, said Swarbrick. The crowd liked this. 

Next up was Mike Lee, councillor for Waitematā and Gulf. Already Lee has tried to ban private helipads in residential areas in the city, Waiheke and Aotea Great Barrier through a notice of motion made in the council. Lee proposed to redefine private helipads within residential zones as prohibited activities, underpinned by Section 87A (6) of the Resource Management Act (1991). The Aotea, Waitematā and Waiheke local boards were in full support. However, Auckland Council chief of strategy Megan Tyler advised councillors that the cost of doing work on the ban could run into tens of thousands of dollars and divert resources and attention from the council’s existing work plan. After more than two hours of debate in March last year, the notion was voted down 10-8 (mayor Wayne Brown voted against). 

On Thursday last week, Lee promised to keep fighting for “the right of homeowners, property owners for the peaceful enjoyment of their homes and properties, which they pay so much rates for”. This week, he will move another, similar notice of motion to ban private helicopter landing pads. 

photo of Coxs Bay coastline
The location of the Mowbray-Williams helipad (Photo: Peter Kensington/Auckland Council)

So what are the 100 people warming up the sea scout hall on a rainy evening to do? That was the subject of the half-hour long Q&A, or perhaps C&A, as comments vastly outnumbered questions. Their first weapons will be emails to councillors, requesting that they support Lee’s notice of motion. Though Quiet Sky has set up a one-click link to email all 21 councillors at once, a woman wanted to know who would be best to target because when she emailed Albert-Eden-Puketāpapa councillor Julie Fairey, the response was “a large amount of waffle that was terribly hard to understand”. Which of the 10 who voted against the previous motion were most likely to be persuaded? It was a question Lee didn’t quite answer. A man stood up to ask if the people making decisions had the “brains of chocolate fish”.

There were also a few radicals in the group. “How about organising a protest in front of the council office?” proposed one. The couple in front of me looked at each other and smiled excitedly. Someone suggested the protest be outside 38 Rawene Ave instead. The fact came up that in Paris private helipads are banned (or at least heavily restricted). Swarbrick did not miss the opportunity to say, “the French know how to protest”. 

For Jeanette Budgett of Quiet Sky, the battle for peace and quiet on Rawene Ave is about stopping an “open season” of helipads all around Auckland without neighbours getting any say. The group is eyeing up an appeal to the Environment Court. But there’s a problem – Budgett thinks it would cost at least $150,000 and even more if the appeal was lost. And even though the group live in the leafy suburbs, they’re “not very well off”. By 8pm the meeting had been wrapped up with a karakia and people headed out into the wind and puddles that surrounded the bay. Somewhere behind pōhutukawa trees and double-glazed glass, Anna Mowbray and Ali Williams were probably looking out over that same moving sea.