HMH_FeatureImage-4.png

SocietyJune 19, 2025

Help Me Hera: How do I repair my relationship with a politically aggressive cousin?

HMH_FeatureImage-4.png

We used to be so close, but their blunt communication style keeps hurting my feelings.

Want Hera’s help? Email your problem to helpme@thespinoff.co.nz

Dear Hera,

I have a cousin I was very close to as a kid through our mid-20s, but recently we have drifted apart and it has become very hard to connect with them. They are one of the closest cousins in age to me (they are a few years older than me; I’m 30).

In their late 20s, they went through a pretty rough period that has left them chronically disabled and unable to work. They have also been on a bumpy and ongoing journey, coming out as queer and autistic. None of this impacts the love or support for them I have in any way, shape or form.

But I now feel it is very difficult to talk to them about anything, because as a result of this stretching and exploration of their identity, they have formed some very firm opinions about gender/sexuality, politics, capitalism, the disability space (apropos of nothing, I ALSO have a chronic illness, albeit one that is different to theirs) and that crosses over to almost all topics. Essentially, if you don’t agree with them now on any of the above, it feels like there is no room for nuance and your words are taken in their least charitable interpretation.

This has resulted in at least one discussion where my feelings were incredibly hurt (though no, they probably don’t know that because I didn’t want to hurt THEIR feelings by bringing it up). I know this communication approach is one trait common among neurodivergent people, but I don’t just want to brush my own feelings aside.

As a result, I’ve felt unable to talk to them about anything big or important, for fear of coming across wrong or accidentally offending them. Sure we still text, but it’s all pretty superficial stuff compared to how it once was. I don’t know how to bring up the fact I feel like I can’t connect with them anymore without sounding like I’m not supporting their (valid!!) needs and accommodations. But also, maybe they don’t feel the same way and it’s all in my head??

Basically, how do I express to this cousin that I love and support them, but also that I feel a bit hurt and want to work on reshaping our relationship???

From,

A Cousin Adrift

Dear ACA,

This is another one of those letters which falls into the category of “how to have a difficult conversation with someone you love.” To which my answer is usually, reluctantly. 

This question has been stressing me out all week. Every time I try to answer it sensibly, I feel myself coming over in tedious platitudes. Use I based statements. Come from a place of vulnerability rather than blame. Ask questions to get to the heart of things. The whole thing makes me feel irrationally disgusted, like taking a shit in public. What’s wrong with the old Anglican method of slowly internalising all your anger until it calcifies into cancerous nugget you carry with you to your grave? 

However, that’s not the attitude of a responsible advice columnist, so I’m going to grit my teeth and try a little harder. 

I often get similar letters, from people wanting to know how to convert their belligerent oil magnate relatives into seeing the wisdom of the capital gains tax. I don’t often get letters from people on the same side of the political spectrum.

In an ideal world you would have said what you needed to in the moment, instead of carrying your grievance around like a sack of festering roadkill. But difficult conversations are difficult for a reason, and it’s hard to let someone you love know they’ve fucked you off. It’s even harder when they have a blunt communication style, and a bunch of fresh ideologies burning a hole in their pocket. 

In your cousin’s defence, I think it’s easy, when newly politically awakened, to go a little rhetorically overboard. Usually such people have their hearts in the right place, and a little time slumming it in the real world tends to soften their ideological corners. However, some people remain annoying forever. 

It’s hard to know what to suggest with this sort of person. Do you try to increase their tolerance for dissenting opinions by picking a few low stakes fights about harmless bullshit, or do you grit your teeth and save up the truth for when it really matters?   

On the surface, “how do I tell my cousin they’ve hurt my feelings?” is straight out of a 1950s church newsletter. But figuring out how to tell someone you love they’re being a pain in the ass in a way that enriches and deepens your relationship requires top tier diplomacy skills.

It almost feels like you’re asking for a script, but I’m a hater of script-based interaction. It’s too easy to recklessly suggest you just tell your cousin what you’re thinking. The last thing I want to do is push you out of the helicopter with a false sense of optimism and a copy of “non-violent communication” to break your fall. No matter how many Ted Talks on the radical power of vulnerability you watch, it’s hard to find a productive way to argue with someone you love. Ask any tenured couples therapist.

As far as I can see, you have a few options. 

  1. Grit your teeth and say what you need to say. Sometimes the only way to survive a relationship with a bulldozer is to become more of a bulldozer yourself. It’s possible your cousin might even appreciate a blunt approach. But people don’t always have to take criticism well for the conversation to be a success. Sometimes there’s no polite way to impart a difficult truth. Even if your cousin reacts poorly in the moment, the message may eventually sink in, even if you have to endure a little temporary sulking. 
  2. Play the long game. Closeness and radical transparency aren’t necessarily the same thing. I’m not saying you shouldn’t say anything when your cousin offends you. But it might be received better in the moment, rather than reheating your stale grievance months later, or holding a “state of the nation” about your relationship. It’s OK to roll your eyes and let some things slide, for the sake of posterity. If longevity is your goal, sometimes forgiveness is more productive than honesty. I don’t know how psychologically enlightened this is, but it serves you right for writing into a New Zealand advice columnist. 
  3. Go away to a cabin together and take a lot of mood enhancing drugs. Have a nine-hour conversation that brings you both to a plane of new understanding. 

#1 is the answer I feel I’m supposed to give, with a little nauseatingly disingenuous “speak from a place of vulnerability” thrown in. #2 is what I would do, in your situation. And #3 is probably the most fun/likely to produce a positive outcome.

Good luck!

Keep going!
LGBTQI+ people face discrimination trying to find housing and once they are flatting.
LGBTQI+ people face discrimination trying to find housing and once they are flatting.

SocietyJune 19, 2025

New research finds over half of LGBTQI+ flatters experience housing discrimination

LGBTQI+ people face discrimination trying to find housing and once they are flatting.
LGBTQI+ people face discrimination trying to find housing and once they are flatting.

New research shows that flatting is a ‘site of vulnerability’ for queer people, and recommends policy change.

“I was kicked out of a house when coming out as trans to my flatmates and asking they use my preferred name and pronouns.”

“[I was] asked to leave a flat when someone suspected I was ‘a faggot.’” 

“They said they wouldn’t be comfortable with a gay couple moving in.”

“An old flatmate’s girlfriend was visibly uncomfortable interacting with me… I used to hate it when she came over.” 

“My flatmate’s boyfriend often made questionable comments about queer people in front of me and she did nothing to stop it”.

These are just a few of the 894 survey responses that housing and health researcher Brodie Fraser from the University of Otago has analysed in an academic paper published this morning. The paper, Flatting amongst LGBTQI+ people in Aotearoa New Zealand, finds that over half of the queer flatter participants experienced housing discrimination. Homeowners experienced it too, though at lower levels. Homophobia and transphobia came from flatmates, landlords, property managers, visitors, real estate agents and neighbours.

photo of a person smiling curly brown hair
Dr Brodie Fraser.

Fraser put out the online survey with 45 questions covering demographics, housing quality, household composition, wellbeing, homelessness, involuntary mobility and discrimination as part of their post-doctoral research in 2022. Where their PHD had focused on the LGBTQI+ communities’ experiences of homelessness, Fraser now wanted to consider why queer people are over-represented in homeless statistics. Data from the 2023 census shows that in New Zealand, LGBTQI+ people experience homelessness at higher rates than non-LGBTQI+ people. The census also shows that LGBTQI+ people are more likely to be renting, have lower incomes and live in poorer quality housing than their non-LGBTQI+ counterparts. “Things are pretty bad,” says Fraser. “What’s going on upstream?”

People flat mainly because it’s cheaper than renting on their own. In New Zealand and other traditionally home-owning countries, flatting is becoming increasingly common, and the age of flatters is rising. Figures from the 2023 census show that young people are staying at home with family longer, likely due to affordability. However, international research shows that this is often not an option for LGBTQI+ people – family relationship breakdowns, such as parents not accepting queer identities, force people from their homes. This adds another level of precarity, and it’s more likely that LGBTQI+ people will find themselves without a home or having to accept substandard conditions – either in the built or social aspects of the home. While flatting, and bad flatting situations, are not unique to LGBTQI+ people, they often have less time, money and options when considering where to live. Where many flatters will have experienced a “bad” flatmate that leaves dirty dishes or is noisy, this latest research shows LGBTQI+ flatters deal with flatmates who are discriminatory towards their sexual orientation or gender and make them feel unsafe, or even kick them out.

diagram showing demographics of the survey sample
Initial survey findings by Hugo Cordue.

The flatters in Fraser’s survey worried about housing discrimination and often moved because of a relationship breakdown within their household. Each time they had to look for a new home, they were opened up to potential discrimination from flatmates, landlords and others. There was a high rate of exposure to homelessness: 37.5% of survey respondents had experienced it. Another recurring theme was that people preferred to live with other queer people to avoid potential homophobia or transphobia. This can involve housing hunting through specific avenues.

Flatting is a kind of “wild west”, says Fraser. It’s often seen as being part of a life stage that young people pass through, though data, particularly from the census, shows that it is increasingly becoming a long-term arrangement for adults, due in part to housing unaffordability. Still, legal and policy frameworks are not targeted at flatting. The Residential Tenancies Act 1986 only covers tenants (who have signed onto the lease) and landlords, not flatmates. Only landlord-tenant disputes are heard by the Tenancy Tribunal. There is a house sharing agreement template, but it “holds no actual weight,” says Fraser. It means that flatting is “a site of vulnerability, of discrimination, and you don’t have any recourse, you don’t have any way to protect yourself and you can end up homeless very, very quickly”.

Fraser points to another piece of research, from the UK, on why policy may be missing. It examined parliamentary discussions, particularly around LGBT homelessness, and found that across parties, there’s an emphasis on collecting data before action towards policy. The authors argue that the conservative political party can signal progress without risking their conservative supporters. “Parliamentarians in particular, use lack of data and lack of evidence as a way to say, well, we can’t do anything because we don’t know anything,” says Fraser. “It’s a way for them to avoid taking responsibility for something that is so clearly an issue.”

The findings of the research published today came as no surprise to Fraser, who is seven years deep into studying the broader topic. But that’s not to say it’s not important to them. “It is really affirming to get that down and to be able to publish it in an academic way. That puts weight behind what activists are saying, what the community members are saying. Science has shown that this is what is happening. We’re not just making it up. Please listen to us.”